Fumbling Arizona: D-Backs 4, Tigers 3

So is it worse to see the Tigers lose games they were never really in, as seemed to be the case in Kansas City? Or is it much more frustrating for Detroit to lose a game they were winning, only to let that victory slip away?
The Tigers looked like they were cruising toward a win against the best team in baseball, as if they had risen to the level of their competition. They tagged Dan Haren for three runs early in the game, two of which came on a long overdue home run by Miguel Cabrera. (A homer was long overdue from any Tiger besides Matt Joyce.) And Jeremy Bonderman hadn't allowed a hit in his first four innings, looking as good as he has all season.
It can all change so fast.
I'm sure Jim Leyland was right on the edge in deciding whether or not to send Bonderman out for the seventh. When Bondo didn't have to bat in the top of the inning, Leyland didn't have to worry about pinch-hitting for him. But it's certainly worth wondering why the Tigers already didn't have someone warming up in the bullpen before Arizona came to bat. Once Bondo walked Justin Upton to lead off the inning, he really had no choice but to face Chris Snyder because Detroit didn't have anyone else ready.
And then defense bit this team yet again, kind of like a snake might sneak up and bite a tiger. Snyder's foul pop-up to the third base side inexplicably fell between a bermuda triangle of Carlos Guillen, Edgar Renteria, and Matt Joyce. Either Guillen or Renteria looked as if they could easily make the play, but the catch was lost in communication. Renteria backed off, as if he thought Guillen would make the catch. But Guillen clearly thought Renteria called him off, as he lowered his hands that were set to make the catch. (In his postgame comments, however, Leyland said "nobody called it.")
Not only was there no out, but Snyder eventually walked, moving Upton to scoring position. And score he did, when Zach Miner replaced Bonderman and gave up a single to Eric Byrnes. That wasn't the game right there, but it definitely sent the roller coaster car plummeting downhill. And the Tigers haven't often shown the mental toughness to come back from a blow like that. They went down 1-2-3 in the eighth and ninth innings against the D-Backs' bullpen, and that was the game.
This was a tough loss to take, perhaps even tougher when you see how well the Tigers can play against a great team, only to watch their flaws get the best of them and cost them a much-needed win.
That's it from me for the next two weeks, folks, as I'm off to southeast Asia. I leave you in the soft, buttery hands of Big Al and Mike McClary, and hope the Tigers give you some better things to talk about and some moments to enjoy while I'm away.
Roll Call
It's too bad the game became such a disappointment, because we had a fun GameThread tonight. (Of course, it's always more fun when the Tigers are winning.) I'll have to go back and check the comments, but did Detroit take the lead while I was taking a phone call, only to squander it once I returned? If so, I accept that responsibility and take my bad juju with me to Malaysia.
Thanks to miggy4mvp, busta (welcome!), ThaWalrus9, rock n rye, MackAveKurt, HavocRox, Zappatista, tbliggins, Juskimo, pfuhrmeister, and Roar of the Tigers (Samela!) for participating this evening.
0 comments | 0 recs
Game 42: Tigers (16-25) at D-Backs (26-15)
Jeremy Bonderman (2-4, 4.80) vs.
Dan Haren (4-2, 3.04)
Oh, this looked like it would be such a great series when the 2008 schedule was first released. And maybe it still will be. But the Tigers weren't supposed to be shuffling into Arizona with hunched shoulders, avoiding everyone's gaze. Their record wasn't supposed to be a virtual mirror opposite of the Diamondbacks'. And Bonderman vs. Haren was supposed to be a clash of pitching titans.
By the way, are you already sick of hearing "Well, at least Detroit doesn't have to face Brandon Webb in this series"? I sure am. Is that how far it's already fallen for the Tigers, when we're happy to avoid an ace pitcher? Remember when we wanted to see how elite pitchers might fare against this lineup?
Besides, it's not like the Tigers catch a break in facing Dan Haren. On several other teams, he'd be the staff ace. And that's pretty much how he's been pitching so far this season. Haren has allowed more than three runs in just three of his eight starts. In his last two appearances, he's given up four total runs over 13 innings. Amazingly, Haren didn't win either of those games. He also hasn't pitched that well against the Tigers in six career starts, posting a 1-4 record and 5.12 ERA.
Someone else who hasn't been pitching well, in a much broader sense, is Jeremy Bonderman. He lasted just four innings against the Yankees last Saturday, giving up five runs, six hits, and four walks. Some blame Bondo's ineptness on an ill-fated attempt to grow a mustache. I still think he should see how far he can take the 'stache, but if he stinks tonight, there probably needs to be a clubhouse intervention with a shaving kit.
While watching tonight's game, I'll be lamenting not joining The Daily Fungo summit in Arizona this weekend, an unfortunate casualty of my travel plans to Malaysia. Hopefully, Mike and the rest of Team Fungo share some of their experiences from Chase Field here at BYB. Given how well Detroit has performed in Interleague Play over the past couple of seasons, maybe they'll be witness to a Tigers resurgence.
AZ Snakepit has your SB Nation opposing view for this three-game interleague series.
Short Hops:
- Joe Sheehan examines whether or not the DH really gives AL teams an advantage at Baseball Prospectus.
- Yahoo! Sports' Jeff Passan has some suggestions to spruce up Interleague Play, and some of them are pretty creative.
- We know at least two Tigers will be in uniform at the All-Star Game. Jim Leyland has been named as one of Terry Francona's coaches.
- Buster Olney ($$) wonders if the Tigers might have to enter the C.C. Sabathia sweepstakes.
148 comments | 0 recs
A Little Bit o' Mock Draft For You
Three weeks before the amateur draft, Baseball America has posted a mock draft of the first round. With their #21 pick, the BA crew has the Tigers selecting reliever Andrew Cashner, who was the closer for Texas Christian this season.
With one more game remaining in TCU's season before the Mountain West tournament, Cashner has an 8-3 record with eight saves in 26 appearances, and 71 strikeouts in 46 1/3 innings. (I'm pretty sure I'm reading that right. Check for yourself.)
- Here's a draft report on Cashner from MILB.com, detailing his pitching repertoire that includes a 97-98 m.p.h fastball and an 87-88 m.p.h. slider.
- John Sickels has Cashner ranked seventh among the top college pitchers in the draft.
- And here's what Jonathan Mayo has to say in his latest Draft Report.
0 comments | 0 recs
"I hope they were voting on [playoff] shares."
Jim Leyland, when asked about the Tigers' players-only meeting before yesterday's game.
Will This Be Getting Any Better?
I'm not writing a recap of whatever that thing was the Tigers did at Kauffman Stadium today. Just so you know. Earlier this evening, I told myself that maybe I should write a recap because a lot of people probably didn't get to see the game while at work. But here's the thing: I didn't watch much of it either. Not once I saw the Tigers fall behind 3-0 in the first inning. And once I saw the final score, I was not about to put myself through that - even if I could whiz through the commercials, DVR-style.
After two games in which Detroit received the sort of starting pitching that should've resulted in two wins, if not for an inexplicable lack of offense, Kenny Rogers just crumbled out there today. Maybe the weight of having to carry the pitching staff - a burden he's hardly suited for anymore - finally broke him. Or maybe he figured that he wouldn't get any run support today, anyway, so why not just chuck the ball up there and see what happens?
Seven Royals runs on 11 hits is what happened. In four innings. To a Kansas City lineup that had Alex Gordon, Mark Grudzielanek, and David DeJesus on the bench. But I'm not writing a recap.

So what are we talking about here? The Detroit Tigers, the team that generated so much hope and excitement for us throughout the winter and spring, are now nine games under .500. They were seven games under when Tigers fans began pulling their hair, ran into the streets screaming, and contemplated ledges and bridges to jump from. Some of us suddenly felt major doubt. Others wondered if it was now horrifyingly apparent that this team had made some major mistakes in player acquisitions. And the Tigers haven't gotten any better since then. Record-wise, they're now worse. Are any of these guys your Tiger right now?
11 comments | 0 recs
If I Wrote This, You Would Laugh Me Off This Blog
Attacking the local media is usually Big Al 's territory, but I just read something that is so brain-dead that I can't keep quiet about it. (And since Big Al is filling in here for the next two weeks, maybe this will serve as something of a warm-up for you.)
Eric Pate (formerly of Booth Newspapers, and perhaps still of WDFN - I'm not sure) "guest blogs" at the Freep, where he posted one of the most nonsensical suggestions I've read this season:
For the record, I’m sure happy that I’m not Dave Dombrowski. But if I were, the first move would involve moving Gary Sheffield and a combination of a utility player or farmhand for a quality major league starter. I’ll let the pundits define who that might be, but the starter is essential.
I'm sure Double-D will get right on that, E.
I don't know if I qualify as a "pundit," but please allow me to try and play one right now. No one is going to be able to define what kind of "quality major league starter" the Tigers would receive in return for Sheffield, because such a player doesn't exist. There's not a team in Major League Baseball that would make that trade today.
Sheffield can't throw a baseball right now, and can barely swing a bat every other day. Who's going to take on a player like that, let alone give up a starter (position player or starting pitcher, Pate doesn't say) for him? This isn't the NBA, where you can trade for an expiring contract, then use it to clear room on your salary cap. Oh, by the way, Sheffield's contract runs through next season.
This is exactly the sort of thoughtless hackery that traditional media so often accuses bloggers of spewing. (I suppose Pate can always say, "Well, it's supposed to be a blog! I can write whatever comes to mind!" Yes, but what if it's mindless?) This is the kind of "idea" that makes sports talk radio hosts hang up the phone. Yet there it is, right on the Detroit Free Press website.
2 comments | 0 recs
Game 41: Tigers (16-24) at Royals (18-21)
Kenny Rogers (3-3, 5.82) vs.
Gil Meche (2-5, 6.31)
Can the Tigers salvage a win in Kansas City before heading off to Arizona for interleague play? (How do you like Detroit's chances in that series, by the way?) Between today's matinee start time and disgust over the piddling effort the Tigers have put forth in the past two games, I don't know how many people are going to be watching this one. We welcome all participation in the GameThread, of course, and will try our best to keep those of you at work updated.
How about just scoring some runs? With any kind of offense at all, the Tigers likely would've won the last two games. Gil Meche could give up some runs, having allowed five in his last start versus the Orioles. He's also served up five runs or more in four of his eight appearances this year. But Meche could also just as easily shut Detroit out again. That's what he did against Cleveland two starts ago.
Kenny Rogers has been pitching well lately, and is arguably the Tigers' best starting pitcher right now. But again, if his lineup can't score any runs for him, it's not going to matter how well he throws today. Perhaps it's an encouraging sign that the Tigers have averaged seven runs over Rogers' last four starts. (Of course, they were also shut out in each of his three starts before that, so...)
Short Hops:
- Both Billfer and Big Al are wondering why Gary Sheffield isn't on the disabled list, now that the Tigers have made it clear his shoulder is too injured to play the outfield. I think it's terribly clear that if Sheff can't help the team right now, he needs to be shelved for someone who can. (Free Ryan Raburn!)
- For you R.E.M. fans out there, did you know Peter Buck is recording an album of baseball-related songs? (via Pop Candy)
51 comments | 0 recs
We're screwed up. But if we hit like we're capable of hitting, and we pitch like we're capable of pitching, and we make plays like we're capable of playing and [I] manage good, we'll be just fine.
Jim Leyland, sounding like he's not sure what to make of all this, either.
1 day ago
Ian Casselberry
0 comments
0 recs
We're Entering a World of Pain: Royals 2, Tigers 0
I was ready to begin this recap with a picture depicting rage, because it's infuriating to see this Tigers lineup unable to push a single run across the board. But since we had something of a Big Lebowski theme going on in tonight's GameThread, we have The Dude. And he minds. This will not stand, man.
I don't know how Justin Verlander didn't absolutely erupt in the dugout when he left the game down 2-0, giving up just six hits. (And the big hit, if you even want to call it that, was a single that Joey Gathright flipped over a drawn-in Carlos Guillen at third base.) Maybe that's called being a professional. I think some Gatorade barrels, space heaters, and baseball bats should've been fearing for their lives.
To revise a point I posted before tonight's game , the Detroit Tigers have scored just four runs in Verlander's last four starts. Four runs. Total. No starting pitcher is going to overcome such an utter lack of offense. It's obscene for Verlander to be dragging along a 1-7 record. No way is he pitching that badly. I don't know how his teammates can look him in the eye right now. At the very least, somebody in the Tigers' clubhouse should be taking him to Arthur Bryant's for some barbecue. Let him mask the pain with a pulled pork-induced food coma.
And chew on this: This is the sixth time the Tigers have been shut out in 40 games. Some runs would really tie this team together. Luke Hochevar is good, but Detroit made him look like an ace tonight. Four base hits. All singles. That's all the Tigers could manage. The bums will always lose.
Roll Call
Well, despite the result, we had some fun in the comments tonight. And we have The Big Lebowski to thank for it. Who do we blame for that, by the way? rock n rye? (Apologies to those who hadn't seen the movie and left to wonder what the hell we were talking about. Hey, you could rent it for Monday's off-day.)
Strong men also cry. These guys are shedding tears for abysmal baseball tonight: spotstarters, Zappatista, pfuhrmeister, ThaWalrus9, Grant E., HavocRox, rock n rye, Tigsfan, ahtrap, cherub_daemon, Tony K, and bradm.
8 comments | 0 recs
Game 40: Tigers (16-23) at Royals (17-21)
Justin Verlander (1-6, 6.43) vs.
Luke Hochevar (2-2, 4.94)
Will last night's tough loss to the Royals linger with the Tigers in the second game of this series? It very well could if Detroit scores as few runs for Justin Verlander as they did for Nate Robertson. And for all the chatter about Verlander's struggles this season, poor run support has been a nagging issue. The Tigers have scored four runs total in his last three starts. How many starting pitchers could overcome that?
If Verlander only gets one or two runs tonight, he should trash a dugout heater like Mark Buehrle did last week in Chicago. Unless, of course, he wins. And he's pitched very well at Kauffman Stadium.
Luke Hochevar has had his own issues with run support, as the Royals have scored just one run in each of his losses this year. He wasn't great in his last start, however, giving up four runs in seven innings versus the Orioles. But in his two prior appearances, Hochevar gave up just three runs over 12 innings, looking like the type of pitcher who Kansas City selected first overall in the 2006 draft. According to our friend Sam Mellinger, Hochevar is also really good at Rock Band.
No Gary Sheffield in left field tonight, and Jason Beck reports that Jim Leyland won't be playing Sheff out there as much because of that bad shoulder. Geez, that move didn't last very long, did it? But Matt Joyce has been playing some good defense out there, and that's where he'll be this evening.
170 comments | 0 recs























Blogs
Most Commented
Game 40: Tigers (16-23) at Royals (17-21)
by Ian Casselberry 2 days ago
170 comments | 0 recs
Game 42: Tigers (16-25) at D-Backs (26-15)
by Ian Casselberry about 7 hours ago
148 comments | 0 recs
Game 39: Tigers (16-22) at Royals (16-21)
by Ian Casselberry 3 days ago
119 comments | 0 recs
Game 41: Tigers (16-24) at Royals (18-21)
by Ian Casselberry 1 day ago
51 comments | 0 recs
Off-Day Open Thread
by Ian Casselberry 4 days ago
16 comments | 0 recs